Sunday, October 31, 2010

பிரிவு......


பிரிவு என் வாழ்க்கையில பருவ மழைபோல் ஆகிவிட்டது,

சென்ற ஆண்டு இதே நவம்பர் மதத்தில், மழை நின்ற மாலை பொழுதில் மரினா சாலையில் குடையுடன் தனியாக நடந்து சென்றுகொண்டு இருந்தேன், என் மிக நெருங்கிய அன்பு, நட்பு என்னை விட்டு பிரிந்து செல்ல வேண்டிய தருணத்தை எண்ணிக்கொண்டு இருந்தது... இதை மறக்கும் அளவிற்கு அன்று என்னகு ஒரு நட்பு கிடைத்தது...

இந்த நவம்பர் மாதம் அதே பருவ மழை, மீண்டும் ஒரு பிரிவு.....

இந்த முறை என்னகு தோள்கொடுக்க ஒரு நிரந்திர நட்பை கண்டுயருகிறேன்... புத்தகங்கள்.... ஆம் புத்தகங்கள் அவை எந்த நவம்பர் மாத பருவ மழைக்கும் என்னை விட்டு பிரியாது....

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Tamil Cinema and its Legacy

Tamil Cinema and its Legacy

Cinema and its Origin:

Cinema is the only medium that reaches every Human being irrespective of Caste, Creed crossing all the barriers setting aside the differences in Religion, Race and culture. It is such a powerful channel that can cater the people with all the information and awareness at any point of time.

Speaking about the origin of Cinema or Motion Picture as it is technically called, Alhazen a 6th century scientist writes in his book called “ Book of Optics” about Camera Obscura which was the first ever Projection Device. But the Cinema which we come across now had its origin during the 19th century when W.K.L Dickson working under Sir Thomas Alva Edison invented the “Kinetograph” a Motion Picture Exhibition Device. The Kinetoscope had its first commercial exhibition on April 14, 1894 at the New York city. Later due to its lake of portability it lost its momentum and succeeded by the now used technique Cinematograph by the Lumiere Brothers in 1890. And till today there are enormous new technologies being invented and used every day.

Cinema in India:

Though cinema had its birth in western countries India is the only nation that used the real zeal of cinema. India explored all the 360 degrees of cinema. Cinema came to India for the first time in the year 1896. Lumiere brothers projected a motion picture in Bombay. The first full-length motion picture in India was produced by Dadasaheb Phalke, a scholar on India's languages and culture, who brought together elements from Sanskrit epics to produce his Raja Harishchandra (1913), a silent film in Marathi. The first Indian chain of cinema theatres was owned by the Calcutta entrepreneur Jamshedji Framji Madan, who oversaw production of 10 films annually and distributed them throughout the Indian subcontinent. And today there are 1000s of theatres in India and it stands as the third largest producer of Motion picture next to Hollywood (America) and Hong Kong (Japan). Cinema in India include films produced in Mumbai, Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Karnataka, Kerala, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal. Indian cinema has found its markets in over 90 countries where films from India are screened. The country also participated in international film festivals especially satyajith ray(bengali),Adoor Gopal krishnan,Shaji n karun(malayalam) . Indian filmmakers such as Shekhar Kapur, Mira Nair, Deepa Mehta etc. found success overseas.The Indian government extended film delegations to foreign countries such as the United States of America and Japan while the country's Film Producers Guild sent similar missions through Europe.

Indian Cinema and Politics:

Cinema is the medium that can transport any kind of information to the public faster than any other medium in this universe. Therefore cinema can be used to deliver awareness, create popularity and even catch the power and rule. This is where India has its remarkable nature towards cinema. India is the only nation which used Cinema’s zeal to capture power and rule the people.

Even America the birth place of Cinema did not use its actual power, some may say Ronald Regan the former American president was an actor, but the truth is he never used cinema as to medium to capture the power and the most important thing is he was not a successful actor. When it comes to India cinema of Tamil Nadu or Tamil Cinema proved its mettle in this.

Tamil Cinema and Politics:

Tamil Cinema as its widely called has a great band of history that starts in the year 1909. Tamil cinema is always closely associated with its regional politics. Tamil Nadu is the first state in India in which a regional political party attained power setting aside the National ruling party the Congress which is said to be the Political organ behind attaining Independence to India. The Dravidian party Dravida Munetra Kazhagam lead by C.N. Annadurai sat on the throne in the year 1967.

Dravidian Movement:

Annadurai_and_Periyar.JPGMGR_with_Kalignernew.jpg

The Dravidian movement was founded in 1925 by Periyar E. V. Ramasamy. The movement aimed to achieve a society where backward castes have equal human rights, and encouraging them to have self-respect in the context of a caste-based society that considered them to be at the lower end of the social hierarchy. In Tamil Nadu an array of regional parties, termed Dravidian parties, owe their origin either directly or indirectly to the Dravidian movement. Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and its political rival All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) have been the major Dravidian parties. One of the major platforms of the Dravidian movement was to achieve political change by means of awareness within the society in everyday life. Thus Dravidian politicians viewed film media as an apt vehicle to promote such a revolution.

Tamil cinema:

Tamil cinema, like its counterparts in other languages in India, is known as a melodramatic entertainment form plotted around twists of fate set in exaggerated locales, and filled with songs and dances. Although a few stars from other southern states have tried to use film popularity as a stepping stone in politics, such as N. T. Rama Rao (Andhra Pradesh), Rajkumar (Karnataka) and Prem Nazir (Kerala), it was in Tamil Nadu that it was most prominent, with five of the seven Chief Ministers from Dravidian parties hailing from the Tamil film industry. In a state such as Tamil Nadu, where no single caste is predominant, film stars were considered people with wide acceptability to lead.

According to Emeritus Professor K. Sivathamby, from Srilanka, the movie halls themselves acted as a symbol of social equality. He states

“The Cinema Hall was the first performance centre in which all Tamils sat under the same roof. The basis of the seating is not on the hierarchic position of the patron but essentially on his purchasing power. If he cannot afford paying the higher rate, he has either to keep away from the performance or be with 'all and sundry

Politicizing Tamil cinema

"They (Congress party) decried the cinema. We (DMK) used it." — Kannadasan, a Tamil film song writer

Early Tamil films were mainly based on mythological stories, and movies based on contemporary society started only in 1936.With the end of the era of silent movies in the 1930s many stage actors joined the Tamil cinema, and brought the ideologies of Gandhian philosophies with them. Although the Congress party made use of movie stars such as K. B. Sundarambal to appear at political meetings, some congressmen of that era looked upon movie media with contempt. Tamil Congress leaders like C. Rajagopalachari considered movie media to be a source of moral corruption. K. Kamaraj, then president of the All India Congress, mocked DMK's desire to get into power in this statement:

“How can there be government by actors? ”

DMK and cinema

"The DMK films served an audience the party could never have reached by other means " — Professor Robert Hardgrave

Attempts made by some Congress leaders to use stars of Tamil cinema, however minimal, were limited since this media remained inaccessible to the rural population (who were in the majority). The politicizing of movies by the Congress virtually stopped soon after Indian Independence in 1947. With the introduction of electricity to rural areas in the 1950s Dravidian politicians could implement movies as a major political organ.

In post colonial India, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) was the first — at the time the only — party to take advantage of visual movie media. Actors and writers of guerrilla theatre, who were inspired by the ideologies of Periyar, brought the philosophies of Tamil nationalism and anti-Brahminism to celluloid media. The movies not only made direct references to the independent Dravida Nadu that its leaders preached for but also at many times displayed party symbols within the movie. Murasoli Maran, former central minister from DMK, considered that the DMK movies reflected the faces of both the past (demonstrating the rich language and culture of Tamils) and the future (with social justice). The DMK films espoused Dravidian ideologies through use of lengthy dialogues in its initial movies. Nevertheless, as the party's political aspirations grew, the movies based on Dravidian social reformation themes were replaced with stories that would enhance star popularity.

C. N. Annadurai

"With a view to educating the people of Tamilnad. All my stories and screenplays have, therefore, been on themes of social purpose" — Annadurai, on his screen scripts

The use of movie media as a major propaganda vehicle of Dravidian ideologies was first introduced by Annadurai, the founder chief of DMK, through his scripts. During his initial days with Dravidar Kazhagam, Annadurai wrote dramas which promoted social reforms and non-Brahmin self-respect ideologies. After the formation of DMK, Annadurai, along with E. V. K. Sampath (Periyar's nephew and one of the founders of DMK) and actor K. R. Ramaswamy, staged several plays promoting Dravidian ideologies. The DMK party's head office was purchased using the money raised through these plays. Annadurai scripted six screen plays in total.

His first movie was Nallathambi , which starred N. S. Krishnan. It promoted cooperative farming and the abolition of the zamindari system of taxation. His movies such as Velaikaari and Or Iravu carried the hallmarks of propaganda for Dravidian politics

Karunanidhi

"intention was to introduce the ideas and policies of social reform and justice and bring up the status of the Tamil language as they were called for in DMK politics" — Karunanidhi, on Parasakthi

Karunanidhi, the other major leader from DMK, started his propaganda efforts with Parasakthi (1952). Parasakthi was a turning point in Tamil cinema, as until then most movies contained up to 55 songs and were mostly based on mythologies. Parasakthi was initially banned. When it was finally released in 1952 it emerged as a huge box office hit.

“To create havoc. Of course it did. We were challenging the social law itself, the basic Constitution itself.”—S. Punju, the director of Parasakthi, on the movie.,

Like that of his political mentor Annadurai, Karunanidhi's movies carried elements of Dravidian political ideologies such as anti-Brahminism and anti Congress Party messages. Two of the movies that contained such messages were Panam and Thangarathnam. The overall themes of the movies were remarriage of widows, untouchability, self-respect marriages, abolition of zamindari and abolition of religious hypocrisy.

Until 1949-50 Tamil film dialogues were in a Brahminical slang of the Tamil language. Annadurai and Karunanidhi introduced Tamil close to formal language and void of Sanskrit influence. According to Professor Robert Hardgrave Jr, the popularity of their movie dialogues made both Annadurai and Karunanidhi "stars in their own right." After the death of Annadurai, Karunanidhi assumed the office of the Chief Minister in Tamil Nadu, and with intermediate periods of in and out of power, he currently serves his 5th term as the chief.

N. S. Krishnan

N. S. Krishnan, or NSK as he was popularly known, was a Tamil comic actor and, as the times then required, a talented singer. He was never officially a member of any Dravidian party, but served the DMK to a great extent. He was the one of the few non-Brahmins of his era to be popular in a Brahmin-dominated Tamil film industry. His favourite character to play in the movies was a Brahmin buffoon, which he would also enact in DMK meetings. NSK was highly influenced by the ideologies of Periyar and sowed the seeds of anti-Brahmanism in his scripts. NSK served the cause of DMK so much that the last public gathering Annadurai ever attended was to unveil a statue of NSK at a busy intersession in Chennai.

M. R. Radha

M. R. Radha was a stage actor and was popular through his roles as villain on screen. He was an ardent follower of Periyar and was close to most DMK leaders before they split from Dravidiar Kazhagam. Both Annadurai and Karunanidhi were part of M. R. Radha's troupe at different times and had even acted in his plays.

Sivaji Ganesan

Sivaji Ganesan is a veteran actor of Tamil cinema. He started his acting career at the age of six and toured with various drama troupes including that of M. R. Radha. The actor himself was christened Shivaji by Periyar E. V. Ramasami after his role portraying the Marata king in a play named Chandra Mohan. In Chandra Mohan the Marata king triumphs over Brahmins and the role of the villainous Brahmin was played by Annadurai himself.

Sivaji Ganesan made his movie debut in 1952 with Parasakthi, which opens with a song that glorifies Dravidian culture. Sivaji was a Tamil, whereas at the time he entered the film industry most other major actors were Telugus. He later became one of the founding members of DMK. Although it was DMK movies that brought Sivaji to the limelight he found that the responsibilities that the party threw at him limited his acting career. His association with DK and with DMK gave him an atheistic reputation that acted as a barrier between him and the religious segment of the audience. Realising that DMK was no longer an asset to his career, he attacked it as a glamour party and broke party protocol by his pilgrimage to Tirumala Venkateswara Temple. With the growing popularity of MGR in the party, Sivaji left DMK and aligned with the Tamil Nationalist Party of E. V. K. Sampath. When the Tamil Nationalist Party was dissolved he joined the Congress Party. Although Congress itself lost in the elections in the 1967, Sivaji's fans kept the party alive. In spite of being an active member of the Congress party, he made sure his movies were free of political references. After differences with party leaders he launched his own party, Thamizhaga Munnetra Munnani, in 1989 but with little success, even losing his security

M. G. Ramachandran

M. G. Ramachandran was the foremost star for DMK propaganda during its peak and was politically the most successful of any film stars in India. MGR had a simple beginning in stage plays at the age of six. MGR was first invited by Annadurai to star in one of his movies in the 1950s. From then on MGR actively participated in the party's meetings. His films such as Nadodi Mannan, Enga Vitu Pillai, Nam Nadu, Adimai Penn and Engal Thangam displayed a stereotypical image of a philanthropic, mundane hero made out of a vagrant who becomes a king.

Unlike other DMK actors, MGR used his screen popularity in social works as well, which included financing the poor, running orphanages and participating in disaster relief. MGR's movies portrayed him as a friend of the poor and downtrodden. MGR himself commented

“My roles have been to show how a man should live and believe”

MGR always acted as a hero and made sure that he was always portrayed in a good light on screen. With the departure of Sivaji Ganesan from DMK, MGR's position within the party grew stronger. In contrast to Parasakthi, MGR's movies made less reference to social justice but dwelled more on contemporary political scenarios. The movies typically included references to Dravida and MGR would be clad in red and black (the DMK flag colours). In sharp contrast with earlier DMK movies where the overall theme was used for propaganda, in MGR's movies the protagonist was shown as a representative of the party ideology, who would fight against evil and support the poor. Thus he played roles that were directly relevant to the filmgoers and displayed himself as a symbol of the fulfilment of their own dreams. MGR, however, made sure that his social image, which he gained by independent charity and social works, did not get merged with that of DMK.

With his rising popularity with the common man MGR fell into controversy by referring to K. Kamaraj, the Congress leader, as My leader. MGR resigned as a Member of Legislative Council. Soon after, the attendance of his then newly released movie dropped, with DMK supporters boycotting the movie.

Annadurai, on M. G. Ramachandran

“When we show his (MGR's) face, we (DMK) get 40,000 votes; when he speaks a few words, we get 4 lakh”

Just before the 1967 general elections MGR was shot by M. R. Radha in a personal dispute. This incident gained support of sympathising voters for DMK in the days leading up to the elections. Professor Hardgrave claims that at the time of the shooting incident MGR's popularity was slowly declining and the incident helped him regain his stature with the masses as well as the party. Whether DMK gained with MGR's popularity or MGR gained popularity with the rise of DMK remains a question for debate.

Although MGR's charisma probably played a significant role in DMK's success, his popularity also cost the party much. When the party leaders tried to neutralise his powers, MGR launched his own party in 1975, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, with support of the lower cadres alone. According to Professor Hardgrave one of the reasons for antipathy between MGR and the DMK leadership was Karunanidhi's attempt to bring his son M. K. Muthu into the party to replace MGR and to convert MGR fan clubs into Muthu fan clubs

When MGR formed his own party, Karunanidhi underestimated MGR's popularity and commented on AIADMK as "a successful movie’s 100 day run". However, with the support from his fans and low cadres alone, MGR won the 1977 state elections with a landslide victory and continued to rule the state until his death.

J. Jayalalitha

Jayalalitha was the last main leading lady to pair with MGR on screen. She was inducted into AIADMK by MGR himself and frequently accompanied him to party rallies until MGR left for the United States for medical treatment in 1984. After his return, MGR was always accompanied by Janaki Ramachandran, his wife of forty years, until his death in 1987.

Soon after MGR's death, AIADMK was split between his widow Janaki Ramachandran and Jayalalitha. Although both factions had lost the elections, Jayalalitha's AIADMK won 27 seats when compared to just one won by Janaki's party. Following the election defeat, Janaki retired from active politics and the two party factions rejoined. Although a successful film star of yesteryear, according to Professor Sara Dickey, Jayalalitha's popularity in politics comes from MGR rather than her own success on screen. She served two terms as Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu (1991 – 1996 & 2001 – 2006).

After coming across five chief ministers Tamil Cinema still spreads its Legacy over Tamil Nadu and stands as the example to the world in use of Cinema as an effective medium to reach the common man.

R.M.Rizwan, M.Sc (Viscom), M.Phil.,

Asst. Professor.

Dept. Of Visual Communication.

The New College.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Movie Projectors




Movie projectors

A movie projector is an opto-mechanical device for displaying moving pictures by projecting them on a projection screen. Most of the optical and mechanical elements, except for the illumination and sound devices, are present in movie cameras.

Camera Obscura

The camera obscura is an optical device that projects an image of its surroundings on a screen. It is used in drawing and for entertainment, and was one of the inventions that led to photography. The device consists of a box or room with a hole in one side. Light from an external scene passes through the hole and strikes a surface inside where it is reproduced, upside-down, but with colour and perspective preserved. The image can be projected onto paper, and can then be traced to produce a highly accurate representation.



Using mirrors, as in the 18th century overhead version, it is possible to project a right-side-up image. Another more portable type is a box with an angled mirror projecting onto tracing paper placed on the glass top, the image being upright as viewed from the back.

As a pinhole is made smaller, the image gets sharper, but the projected image becomes dimmer. With too small a pinhole the sharpness again becomes worse due to diffraction. Some practical camera obscuras use a lens rather than a pinhole because it allows a larger aperture, giving a usable brightness while maintaining focus.

Magic Lantern



The magic lantern has a concave mirror behind a light source that gathers light and projects it through a slide with an image painted onto it. The light rays cross an aperture (which is an opening at the front of the apparatus), and hits a lens. The lens throws an enlarged picture of the original image from the slide onto a screen. Main light sources used during the time it was invented in the late 1600s were candles or oil lamps. These light sources were quite inefficient and produced weak projections. The invention of the Argand lamp in the 1780s helped to make the projected images brighter. The invention of the limelight in the 1820s made it even brighter, and following that the inventions of the electric arc lamp in the 1850s, and then incandescent electric lamps all further improved the projected image of the magic lantern. It was also an important invention for the motion picture film and 35mm projector because of its ability to screen moving images. To achieve this, mechanical slides were used to make the images move. This was done using two glass slides, one with the part of the picture that would remain stationary and one with the part of the picture that would move on a disc. The glass slides were placed one on top of the other and a hand-operated pulley wheel was used to turn the movable disc. The magic lantern also led directly to Eadweard Muybridge’s invention of the zoopraxiscope, which was another forerunner for moving pictures.

Types of projectors

Projectors are classified by the size of the film used, i.e. the film format. Typical film sizes:

8 mm


Long used for home movies before the video camera, this uses double sprocketed 16 mm film, which is run through the camera twice. The 16 mm film is then split lengthwise into two 8 mm pieces that

Super 8mm


Developed by Kodak, this film stock uses very small sprocket holes close to the edge that allow more of the film stock to be used for the images. This increases the quality of the image. The unexposed film is supplied in the 8 mm width, not split during processing as is the earlier 8 mm. Magnetic stripes could be added to carry encoded sound to be added after film development.

9.5 mm


Film format introduced by Pathé Frères in 1922 as part of the Pathé Baby amateur film system. It was conceived initially as an inexpensive format to provide copies of commercially-made films to home users. The format uses a single, central perforation (sprocket hole) between each pair of frames, as opposed to 8 mm film which has perforations along one edge, and most other film formats which have perforations on each side of the image. It became very popular in Europe over the next few decades and is still used by a small number of enthusiasts today. Over 300,000 projectors were produced and sold mainly in France and England, and many commercial features were available in the format. In the sixties the last projectors of this format were being produced.

16 mm


This was a popular format for audio-visual use in schools and as a high-end home entertainment system before the advent of broadcast television. The most popular home content were comedic shorts (typically less than 20 minutes in length in the original release) and bundles of cartoons previously seen in movie theaters. 16 mm enjoys widespread use today as a format for short films, independent features and music videos, being a relatively economical alternative to 35 mm.

35 mm


35 mm film is typically run vertically through the camera and projector. In the mid 1950's the VistaVision system presented wide screen movies in which the film moved horizontally, allowing much more film to be used for the image as this avoided the anamorphic reduction of the image to fit the frame width. As this required specific projectors it was largely unsuccessful as a presentation method while remaining attractive as filming, intermediate, and source for production printing and as an intermediate step in special effects to avoid film granularity, although the latter is now supplanted by digital methods.

70 mm


High end movie productions were often produced in this film gauge in the 1950s and 1960s and many very large screen theaters are still capable of projecting it in the 21st century. It is often referred to as 65/70, as the camera uses film 65 mm wide, but the projection prints are 70 mm wide. The extra five millimeters of film accommodated the soundtrack, usually a six track magnetic stripe. The most common theater installation would use dual gauge 35/70mm projectors.

The advent of 35 mm prints with digital soundtracks in the 1990s largely supplanted the widespread release of the more expensive 70 mm prints.

IMAX

IMAX is a motion picture film format and projection standard created by the Canadian IMAX Corporation.


IMAX has the capacity to record and display images of far greater size and resolution than most conventional film systems. A standard IMAX screen is 22 × 16.1 m (72 × 52.8 ft) and they are generally the same everywhere. IMAX theatres are described as either "Classic Design," (Purpose-built structures designed to house an IMAX theatre) or "Multiplex Design." The world's largest cinema screen (and IMAX screen) is in the LG IMAX theatre in Sydney, New South Wales. It is approximately 8 stories high, with dimensions of 35.73 × 29.42 m (117.2 × 96.5 ft) and covers an area of more than 1,015 m2 (10,930 sq ft).

IMAX is the most widely used system for special-venue film presentations. As of December 2009, there were more than 400 IMAX theatres in over 40 countries. Imax Corporation has released four projector types that use its 15-perforation, 70mm film format: GT (Grand Theatre), GT 3D (dual rotor), SR (Small Rotor), and MPX, which was designed to be retrofitted in existing multiplex theatres. In July 2008, the company introduced a digital projection system, which it has not given a distinct name or brand, designed for multiplex theatres with screens no wider than 21.3 m (70 ft). A presentation that is digitally projected is nonetheless represented to be IMAX, contrary to the extent of trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

All IMAX projectors, except the standard GT system, can project 3D images.

Most IMAX theatres have flat, rectangular screens, but IMAX Dome theatres, formerly branded as OMNIMAX, use a GT projector with a fish-eye lens to project an image on a tilted hemispheric dome screen. IMAX also has a special simulator technique which uses seat movement/vibration at specific points in the film.


Prasad IMAX theater hyderabad


IMAX BIG cinemas (formerly Adlabs) in Wadala, Mumbai

- the world's largest IMAX Dome theatre

This whole article is available in my blogs:

http://thiraipattarai.blogspot.com/

http://rizumoleculeinc.blogspot.com/

Rizwan.R.M

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

The Bridge on the River Kwai

The Bridge on the River Kwai


Directed : David Lean
Produced: Sam Spiegel
Screenplay: Michael Wilson, Carl Foreman
Novel: Pierre Boulle
Starring: William Holden
Alec Guinness
Jack Hawkins
Sessue Hayakawa
Music by Malcolm Arnold
Cinematography Jack Hildyard
Editing by Peter Taylor
Distributed by Columbia Pictures
Release date October 2, 1957
Running time 161 minutes
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Budget $3 million
Gross revenue $27,2 million
Story or Plot
The Bridge on the River Kwai is a 1957 British World War II film by David Lean based on the novel The Bridge over the River Kwai by French writer Pierre Boulle. The film is a work of fiction but borrows the construction of the Burma Railway in 1942–43 for its historical setting. It stars William Holden, Alec Guinness, Jack Hawkins, and Sessue Hayakawa.
In 1997, this film was deemed "culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant" and selected for preservation in the United States Library of Congress National Film Registry.
Two World War II prisoners of war are burying a dead comrade in a Japanese prison camp in western Thailand. One of them is United States Navy Commander Shears (William Holden), who has bribed the guards to get on the sick list to avoid more strenuous labour. He watches as a large contingent of new British prisoners led by Colonel Nicholson (Alec Guinness) arrives, whistling the "Colonel Bogey March".
The Japanese camp commandant, Colonel Saito (Sessue Hayakawa), addresses them, informing them of his rules, which he chooses not to follow. All prisoners, regardless of rank, are to work on the construction of a bridge over the River Kwai for a new railway line. Nicholson reminds Saito that the Geneva Conventions exempt officers from manual labour, but Saito just walks away.
Meanwhile, Shears and two others attempt to escape. The others are killed, but Shears falls into the river, is carried away, and presumed dead. After many days, Shears stumbles into a Siamese village, whose people help him to escape by a boat. He reaches the Mount Lavinia Hospital at Ceylon.
On parade the next morning, when Saito orders everyone to work, Nicholson orders his officers to stand fast, as the other ranks march off to work. Though Saito has a machine gun set up and threatens to have the officers shot, Nicholson refuses to back down. Saito is dissuaded from carrying through on his threat by Major Clipton (James Donald), the British medical officer, who warns of witnesses. Instead, Saito leaves the officers standing in the intense tropical heat. One officer collapses as the day wears on, but Nicholson and the rest are standing defiantly at attention when the men return from the day's work. The officers are then placed in a punishment hut, while Nicholson is locked into a corrugated iron box by himself to suffer in the heat.
Saito tries to negotiate, but Nicholson refuses to compromise at all. Saito discloses to Nicholson that should he fail to meet his deadline, he would be obliged to commit seppuku (ritual suicide). Construction falls far behind schedule, due in part to "accidents" arranged by the prisoners. Finally, using the anniversary of Japan's great victory in the Russo-Japanese War as an excuse, Saito gives in. Nicholson and his officers triumphantly walk through a jubilant reception, while Saito privately breaks down in tears.
Nicholson conducts an inspection and is shocked by what he finds. Against the protests of some of his officers, he orders Captain Reeves (Peter Williams) and Major Hughes (John Boxer) to design and build a proper bridge, despite its military value to the Japanese, for the sake of his men's morale. The Japanese engineers had chosen a poor site, so the original construction is abandoned and a new bridge is begun 400 yards downstream.
Shears is enjoying his recovery in Ceylon when Major Warden (Jack Hawkins) asks him to volunteer for a commando mission to destroy the bridge. Shears is horrified at the idea and reveals that he is not an officer at all, but an enlisted man who switched uniforms with the dead Commander Shears after the sinking of their ship. Despite his expectation, it did not get him any better treatment. However, Warden already knows. Shears has no choice but to join Warden's unit in return for not being charged with impersonating an officer. He is given the "simulated rank of Major". Untested Canadian Lieutenant Joyce (Geoffrey Horne) and Captain Chapman make up the rest of the team.
Meanwhile, Nicholson drives his men to complete the bridge on time. He even volunteers his junior officers for physical labour, provided that their Japanese counterparts join in as well.
The commandos parachute in, although Chapman is killed in a bad landing. The other three reach the river with the assistance of Siamese women porters and their village chief, Khun Yai. When they encounter a Japanese patrol, Joyce freezes and Warden is wounded in the foot as a result. Nonetheless, the trio get to the bridge, and under cover of darkness, Shears and Joyce plant explosives underwater. The next day, a Japanese train full of soldiers and important officials is scheduled to be the first to use the bridge; Warden waits to blow it up just as the train passes over.
As dawn approaches, the trio are horrified to see that the wire to the explosives has been exposed in places by the receding river. Making a final inspection, Nicholson spots the wire and brings it to Saito's attention. As the train is heard approaching, the two colonels hurry down to the riverbank, pulling up and following the wire towards Joyce, who is waiting by the detonator. When they get too close, Joyce breaks cover and stabs Saito to death, but Nicholson yells for help and tries to stop Joyce (who cannot bring himself to kill Nicholson) from getting to the detonator. A firefight erupts and Yai is killed. When Joyce is hit, Shears swims across the river, but he too is shot, just before he reaches Nicholson.
Recognising the dying Shears, Nicholson suddenly comes to his senses and exclaims, "What have I done?" Warden desperately fires his mortar, mortally wounding Nicholson. The colonel stumbles over to the detonator's plunger and falls on it as he dies, just in time to blow up the bridge and send the train hurtling into the river below. As he witnesses the carnage, Clipton can only shake his head incredulously and utter, "Madness! ... Madness!"
Cast
William Holden as US Navy Commander Shears
Alec Guinness as Lieutenant Colonel Nicholson
Jack Hawkins as Major Warden
Sessue Hayakawa as Colonel Saito
James Donald as Major Clipton
Geoffrey Horne as Lieutenant Joyce
André Morell as Colonel Green
Peter Williams as Captain Reeves
John Boxer as Major Hughes
Percy Herbert as Private Grogan
Harold Goodwin as Private Baker
Awards
Academy Awards
The Bridge on the River Kwai won seven Oscars:
Best Picture: Sam Spiegel
Best Director : David Lean
Best Actor : Alec Guinness
Best Adopted Screenplay: Michael Wilson, Carl Foreman, Pierre Boulle
Best Music: Malcolm Arnold
Best Film Editing: Peter Taylor
Best Cinematography : Jack Hildyard
It was nominated for
Best Actor in a Supporting Role : Sessue Hayakawa
BAFTA Awards
Winner of 3 BAFTA Awards
Best British Film: David Lean, Sam Spiegel
Best Film from any Source: David Lean, Sam Spiegel
Best British Actor : Alec Guinness
Golden Globe Awards
Winner of 3 Golden Globes
Best Motion Picture — Drama — David Lean, Sam Spiegel
Best Director — David Lean
Golden Globe Award for Best Actor - Motion Picture Drama — Alec Guinness
Recipient of one nomination
Best Supporting Actor — Sessue Hayakawa
Other awards
New York Film Critics Circle Awards for Best Film
Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Motion Pictures (David Lean, Assistants: Gus Agosti & Ted Sturgis)
New York Film Critics Circle Awards for Best Director (David Lean)
New York Film Critics Circle Awards for Best Actor (Alec Guinness)
Recognition
The film has been selected for preservation in the United States National Film Registry.
British TV channel Channel 4 held a poll to find the 100 Greatest War Movies in 2005. The Bridge on the River Kwai came in at #10, behind Black Hawk Down and in front of The Dam Busters.
The British Film Institute placed The Bridge on the River Kwai as the eleventh greatest British film.

Criticism
Rottentomatoes:
Rotten tomatoes still rates the film as 95%(General) and 83%(Top Critics) fresh on its Tomato Meter
Top Critics:
The Time (Magazine, USA)
The Bridge on the River Kwai (Sam Spiegel; Columbia) will be called a tragedy; it is. It will be called a comedy; it is. It will be called a swell adventure story, a slickly calculated piece of commercial entertainment, an angry razz at the thing called war, a despairing salute to the men war makes, an ironic masterpiece; it is in some degree all of these things.
It is a whale (2 hr. 41 min.) of a story, and in the telling of it, British Director David Lean (Brief Encounter, Great Expectations) does a whale of a job. He shows a dazzlingly musical sense and control of the many and involving rhythms of a vast composition. He shows a rare sense of humor and a feeling for the poetry of situation; and he shows the even rarer ability to express these things, not in lines but in lives. Most important of all, he understands the real nature of the story he is telling. The film cries from the depths of personal disaster and impersonal fate that man is not the measure of all things, that life is bigger than the things that live it, that there is a meaning, for those who have eyes to read it, even in the gospel of chaos.


Roger Ebert:
The last words in David Lean's ``The Bridge on the River Kwai'' are ``Madness! Madness ... madness!'' Although the film's two most important characters are both mad, the hero more than the villain, we're not quite certain what is intended by that final dialogue. Part of the puzzle is caused by the film's shifting points of view.
Most war movies are either for or against their wars. ``The Bridge on the River Kwai'' (1957) is one of the few that focuses not on larger rights and wrongs but on individuals. Like Robert Graves' World War I memoir, Goodbye to All That, it shows men grimly hanging onto military discipline and pride in their units as a way of clinging to sanity. By the end of ``Kwai'' we are less interested in who wins than in how individual characters will behave.
The scenes in the jungle are crisply told. We see the bridge being built, and we watch the standoff between the two colonels. Hayakawa and Guinness make a good match as they create two disciplined officers who never bend, but nevertheless quietly share the vision of completing the bridge.
Hayakawa was Hollywood's first important Asian star; he became famous with a brilliant silent performance in Cecil B. DeMille's ``The Cheat'' (1915). Although he worked onstage and in films in both Japan and the United States, he was unusual among Japanese actors of his generation in his low-key delivery; in ``Kwai'' he doesn't bluster, but is cool and understated--as clipped as Guinness. (Incredibly, he was 68 when he played the role.)
Alec Guinness, oddly enough, was not Lean's first choice for the role that won him an Oscar as best actor.
The story in the jungle moves ahead neatly, economically, powerfully. There is a parallel story involving Shears that is not as successful. Shears escapes, is taken to a hospital in British-occupied Ceylon, drinks martinis and frolics with a nurse, and then is asked by Maj. Warden (Jack Hawkins) to return as part of a plan to blow up the bridge. ``Are you crazy?'' Shears cries, but is blackmailed by Warden's threat to tell the Americans he has been impersonating an officer. Holden's character, up until the time their guerrilla mission begins, seems fabricated; he's unconvincing playing a shirker, and his heroism at the end seems more plausible.
Lean handles the climax with precision and suspense. There's a nice use of the boots of a sentry on the bridge, sending hollow reverberations down to the men wiring the bridge with plastic explosives. Meanwhile, the British celebrate completion of the bridge with an improbable musical revue that doesn't reflect what is known about the brutal conditions of the POW camps.
Although David Lean (1908-1991) won his reputation and perhaps even his knighthood on the basis of the epic films he directed, starting with ``The Bridge on the River Kwai'' in 1957, there's a contrarian argument that his best work was done before the Oscars started to pile up. After ``Kwai'' came ``Lawrence of Arabia,'' ``Dr. Zhivago,'' ``Ryan's Daughter'' and ``A Passage to India''; all but ``Ryan'' were nominated for best picture, and the first two won. Before ``Kwai'' he made smaller, more tightly wound films, including ``Brief Encounter,'' ``Oliver Twist'' and ``Great Expectations.'' There is a majesty in the later films (except for ``Ryan's Daughter'') that compensates for the loss of human detail, but in ``Kwai'' he still has an eye for the personal touch, as in Saito's private moments and Nicholson's smug inspection of the finished bridge. There is something almost Lear-like in his final flash of sanity: ``What have I done!''



Filmy Bits:
• This film is not a Hollywood film it is a film from United Kingdom.
• This was Canned in Ceylon (now Srilanka)
• This film was the Inspiration for Balumahendra’s interest towards Cinema as it was shot in his place during his School days (Kanndy, Srilanka).
References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bridge_on_the_River_Kwai
http://www.rottentomatoes.com
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,936806-2,00.html as Lieutenant Joyce

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Film Genre

Genre is the term used to describe a loose set of criteria for categorization of literature and speech, as well as many other forms of art or culture. Genres are formed by conventions that change over time as new genres are invented and the use of old ones are discontinued.

While the scope of the word "genre" is commonly confined to art and culture, it also defines individuals' interactions with and within their environments. These interactions and environments must be recurring in order to be recognized as genre.

Film Genre

In film theory, genre refers to the method of film categorization based on similarities in the narrative elements from which films are constructed. Most theories of film genre are borrowed from literary genre criticism. As with genre in a literary context, there is a great deal of debate over how to define or categorize genres. Besides the basic distinction in genre between fiction and documentary, film genres can be categorized in several ways.

Fictional films are usually categorized according to their setting, theme topic, mood, or format . The setting is the milieu or environment where the story and action takes place. The theme or topic refers to the issues or concepts that the film revolves around. The mood is the emotional tone of the film. Format refers to the way the film was shot (e.g., anamorphic widescreen) or the manner of presentation (e.g.: 35 mm, 16 mm or 8 mm). An additional way of categorizing film genres is by the target audience. Some film theorists argue that neither format nor target audience are film genres.

Film genres often branch out into subgenres, as in the case of the courtroom and trial-focused subgenre of drama known as the legal drama. They can be combined to form hybrid genres, such the melding of horror and comedy in the Evil Dead films.


* Source Courtesy: www.wikipedia.org


Rizu

01-07-2010

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Tamil Cinema 2010



2010's Half Yearly report of Tamil Cinema - A Review

Its July now and its time to go around the Pros and Cons of Tamil Cinema in the first half of 2010. When we Speak about cinema "HIT" can be measured in many dimensions like the Revenue earned, The effort, Good Cinema, etc., But now we may just go around and just make a quick review of Jan - July report of Tamil Cinema.

From January 2010 to June 30 2010 totally 55 straight Tamil Films have Hit the Screens. (51 in 2009) out of which the business pandits say only 8 will fulfill their dream of "Profit" . This time Big Stars like Surya, have found a good start. Coming to films, "Ayirathil Oruvan" the most expected magnum Opus from Selvaragavan and Karthi combo failed its hand in the Box Office besides its Technical excellency. The other was Ajith's "Asal" which came with Ajith-Saran brand was a great failiure in the hearts of Audience.. Vijay's "Sura" besides being his 50th film did not do well. Other Expected films like "Goa", "Theeratha Vilayatu Pillai", etc., also lost their hands this year.

Coming to the Successes. "Tamil Padam" from the New commer C.S.Amudhan being a Spoof a real new venture in Tamil Cinema gained its momentum without a large Star Cast. "Vinnaithandi Varuvaya" from Gautham - Simbu combo full filled its desire and ran for 125 days till now a real Musical Hit and Thanks to Rehman... "Singam" from Hari - Suriya combo was back with the bang and became the most successful film ever in terms of Business... it Raced all othe films and Remains as the most Successful film of 2010 till date. "Angadi Theru" from Vasanthabalan though had a delayed release from Ayangran without any Star Cast became the second most Successful film in 2010. It touched the Souls of the audience with its Next Door subject.

Raavanan and Kalavani being just a weak old will not come under consideration.

After grazing around the fact is the word "Expectation" becomes Zero when it comes in the hands of audience. The ticket rates being nominal than compared to other states of the country people dig their way into piracy and make some films fall. Today the "Number of Days" Theory in tamil cinema is no more.. People are very careful and are well aware of their desire, by which the Star casts does'nt do anything with the Audience.

We shall wish Tamil Cinema for more success in the rest of 2010.

Thank You,

Rizu

30.06.2010

M.G.R


A Small News about MGR the most Dynamic Politician That India Saw

"April 14 we shall have the Pooja" said MGR everyone around went into a great shock, he looked at everyone and said "Yes I am the Hero, go get ready with the Script and dialog" Kavingar Vaali was astonished by the work given to him, The matter behind everyone's shock was MGR was just 1 year old as a Chief Minister and he wanted to Act... before a year Karunanidhi's Government denied him a minister post just because he was acting in the films that time. All his wellwishers adviced him not to act because A CM must not do any other jobthat disturbes the duty of a CM... and Mooraji Desai the then PM was very Strict in this.... The next Morning MGR dialled one of his wellwishers and told him to read that day's Indian Express... it Had the Lines of Mooraji Desai saying "MGR can act in Films without disturbing any of his Duties" every single politician in India was astonished from the lines of Mooraji Desai... This was MGR the man of Dynamics...... Rizwan